Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Europe’

Foreign Languages – An important asset for the Engineer in Europe and beyond

October 17th, 2010 3 comments

A foreign language is a valuable transferable skill

There is complacency towards learning foreign languages in Britain – and all English-speaking countries. It takes a lot of time and is it worth the effort if everyone else speaks English?

The trend is continuing - this is the first year French has dropped out of the top ten subjects studied at GCSE. And this may be particularly true for engineers. Students are often good at either sciences or arts – not both. So many engineers don’t find languages easy.

In last weekends FT Simon Kuper argued the English speaker holds the advantage in an English speaking world – so why take the effort to speak a second language poorly and give up this advantage.

This may be true for the boardroom. But in an increasingly international workplace, dealings are not only with younger professionals highly versed in English – but technical experts, older engineers or shop floor workers who have no English.

So when a recruiter reads many similar CVs – this is a skill which will make a CV stand out. A native English-speaking Engineer with a foreign language is a rare and valuable asset! It’s also a transferable skill with many fringe benefits – holidays will never be the same again!

This will be where those who refuse to learn will fail. As increasingly foreign engineers are fluent in English – there will be fewer opportunities for British engineers in international projects. Meanwhile, the engineer of tomorrow will be learning Chinese.

As France gets tough over Eurostar – should Britain also fight to save her industries?

October 13th, 2010 2 comments

A current Eurostar train built by Alstom (photo courtesy of www.blingcheese.com/image/code/6/eurostar.htm)

The £700million deal to update Eurostar trains is in danger of collapse, as French ministers are threatening to wreck the deal after Eurostar chose a German supplier.

Eurostar are controlled by French state owned SNCF – although they became a unified company this year. The decision to change from its current trains built by Alstom to Siemens shocked French officials.

By 2014 the new trains would go direct to Holland, Germany and Switzerland – offering a real alternative to air travel. However French ministers have indicated they will block the deal on safety grounds: These include the change to powered units rather than locomotives, the distance between emergency exits and no inter-connecting carriages.

This is clear protectionism by the French government who have a history of supporting French industry. British officials have no such concerns. Transport Secretary Philip Hammond said he was confident the trains will be approved.

Britain is a leading supporter of the free market – but over recent years has seen the decline of her once proud car and ship-building industries – and her rail industry was never in the running for Eurostar.

But aside the fact that the French are seeking to dictate the rules in an Anglo-French venture. Are the French not right to step-in and protect the loss of £700m of business – which will inevitably cost French jobs?

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.